show_page.php1 : up06.jpg
2 : up06aa02.jpg
3 : up06aa02.jpg
4 : up06aa02.jpg
5 : up06aa10.jpg
6 : up06aa10.jpg
7 : up06aa40.jpg
8 : up06ab40.jpg
9 : up06ac10.jpg
10 : up06ac40.jpg
11 : up06ac40.jpg
12 : up06ad04.jpg
13 : up06ad04.jpg
14 : up06ad04.jpg
15 : up06ad04.jpg
16 : up06ad40.jpg
17 : up06ae40.jpg
18 : up06af40.jpg
19 : up06ag40.jpg
Read-Only Case Details Reviewed: Jan 2009

JPC SYSTEMIC PATHOLOGY

URINARY SYSTEM

January 2024

U-P06

 

SIGNALMENT (JPC # 1727491): Common loon.

 

HISTORY: This common loon (Gavia immer) had been weak, unable to fly, and passed blood-tinged milky droppings two days prior to death.

 

HISTOPATHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION: Kidney: The ureteral epithelium is multifocally either ulcerated or hyperplastic with multiple nuclei stacked up to 15 cells layers thick with loss of cellular polarity. There are numerous coccidia in various stages of development and numerous coccidial oocysts in various stages of sporulation within the hyperplastic ureteral epithelium as well as the lamina propria and underlying interstitium, primarily at foci of ulceration. Developmental stages present include round macrogametocytes that are 15-20µm diameter, thin walled, and filled with 1-4 µm diameter, eosinophilic, round macrogametes; fewer microgametocytes that are 15-18µm diameter with an indistinguishable cell wall and contain myriad, 1 X 2 µm, crescentic, deeply basophilic microgametes; undifferentiated gamonts 4 x 10 µm, ovoid, deeply basophilic and homogeneous; and ovoid to spherical oocysts characterized by 1um, undulant, non-refractile cell that contain either clear cytoplasm or irregularly ovoid aggregates of basophilic material (presumed sporocysts). Within the ureteral lumen are numerous sloughed epithelial cells, degenerate inflammatory cells, and coccidia. The ureteral lamina propria contains moderate numbers of lymphocytes, plasma cells, fewer macrophages, and rare heterophils admixed with the previously described oocysts. Kidney tubules and collecting ducts are multifocally mildly to moderately ectatic, lined by attenuated or rarely necrotic epithelium, and often contain finely granular, pale eosinophilic flocculant material (urates – urate stasis) and variably contain intraluminal oocysts as previously described, sloughed epithelial cells, hemorrhage, and cellular and nuclear debris (cellular and granular casts). Renal tubular and collecting duct epithelium multifocally contains coccidial schizonts (meronts) with merozoites that occasionally are associated with ruptured epithelial cells, with merozoites emerging into the lumen.

 

MORPHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS:  

1.  Ureter: Ureteritis, ulceroproliferative, lymphoplasmacytic, multifocal, moderate, with luminal and transmural coccidia and oocysts, common loon (Gavia immer), avian.

2.  Kidney: Tubular and collecting duct ectasia with intraluminal urate stasis, minimal tubular hyperplasia and necrosis, and intraepithelial and luminal coccidia and oocysts.

 

ETIOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS: Renal coccidiosis

 

ETIOLOGY: Eimeria gaviae

 

GENERAL DISCUSSION:  

 

PATHOGENESIS:  

 

LIFE CYCLE:

 

TYPICAL CLINICAL FINDINGS:  

 

TYPICAL GROSS FINDINGS:  

  • In severe infections, kidneys may become enlarged and pale, containing multiple spots or foci of infection that coalesce into a mottled pattern

 

TYPICAL LIGHT MICROSCOPIC FINDINGS:  

 

TYPICAL ULTRASTRUCTURAL FINDINGS: 

 

ADDITIONAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTS:  

 

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS:  

  • Histological appearance in the kidneys and ureters is distinctive

 

COMPARATIVE PATHOLOGY:  

 

REFERENCES:  

  1. Barthold SW, Griffey SM, Percy DH. Pathology of Laboratory Rodents and Rabbits. 4th ed. Ames, IA: Wiley Blackwell; 2016: 83, 236.
  2. Bowman DB.  Georgis’ Parasitology for Veterinarians. 10th Ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders; 2014:98-103.
  3. Conley KJ, Shilton CM. Crocodilia. In: Terio KA, McAloose D, St. Leger J, eds. Pathology of Wildlife and Zoo Animals. London, UK: Academic Press; 2018:861. 
  4. Dunn PA.  Diseases of the Duck.  In: Boulianne M., ed. Avian Disease Manual. 8th ed. Jacksonville, FL: American Association of Avian Pathologists; 2019:185.
  5. Fenton H, McManamon, Howerth EW. Anseriformes, Ciconiiformes, Charadriiformes, and Gruiformes. In: Terio KA, McAloose D, St. Leger J, eds. Pathology of Wildlife and Zoo Animals. London, UK: Academic Press; 2018:712.
  6. Schmidt R, Reavill DR, Phalen DN. Pathology of Pet and Aviary Birds. 2nd ed. Ames, IA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2015: 135.
  7. Smith DA. Palaeonathae: Apterygiformes, Casuariiformes, Rheiformes, Struthioniformes; Tinamiformes. In: Terio KA, McAloose D, St. Leger J, ed. Pathology of Wildlife and Zoo Animals, Cambridge, MA Academic Press; 2018: 644
  8. Spagnoli ST, Gelberg HB. Alimentary System and the Peritoneum, Omentum, Mesentery, and Peritoneal Cavity. In: Zachary JF, ed. Pathologic Basis of Veterinary Disease. 7th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2022:454-456.
  9. Stanton JB, Zachary JF. Mechanisms of Microbial Infections. In: Zachary JF, ed. Pathologic Basis of Veterinary Disease. 7th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2022:287-290. 
  10. Uzal FA, Plattner BL, Hostetter JM.  Alimentary system.  Maxie MG, ed. Jubb, Kennedy and Palmer’s Pathology of Domestic Animals. Vol 2. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2016:227-235.


Click the slide to view.



Back | Home | Contact Us | Links | Help |